Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
So you're just anti-intellectual and can't debate, got it...
If your position were correct, there'd be evidence by now, you're just wrong.
Wow. The projection is infinite from Leftoids.
And the complete lack of self-awareness.
There's piles of evidence that I am correct.
The problem is that your filter won't let you see it because it would prove you wrong. And Leftoids can never be wrong.
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
Who's the one denying evidence?
You don't seem to understand the difference between Propaganda and Evidence.100% projection, you project and then say I'M projecting?
Logic44 wrote to Dr. What <=-
Who's the one denying evidence?
You don't seem to understand the difference between Propaganda and Evidence.
But that's not a surprise since you have no critical thinking skills and the TV didn't tell you to think that way today.
... To know the road ahead, ask those coming back.
I read an interesting theory the other day and actually had a bit of a debate with some guys at work. The article went on to explain that trans is considered a birth defect. I thought hmmm. I guess I mean, the argument is such that biologically we are designed to pro create and have very distinguished gender roles. I'm still trying to wrap my head around this.. has anyone else heard about this theory or proposition?
Darkman Almighty wrote to Dr. What <=-
I read an interesting theory the other day and actually had a bit of a debate with some guys at work. The article went on to explain that
trans is considered a birth defect.
I haven't heard that one. It seems like they are working to make "trans" a physical illness rather than the mental illness that it is. I guess they need to deflect blame away from their operatives in the schools that push children toward getting their healthy body parts chopped off.
Now, I have seen some work on homosexuality being tied to the wide-spread use of birth control pills (there's a unintentional pun in there). No "smoking gun" on that yet, but the evidence so far seems to point that way. Imagine being delusional enough to think that trans adults don't grow up from being trans kids...
Re: Re: Trans 2a
By: Darkman Almighty to Dr. What on Sun Aug 02 2026 13:33:00
I read an interesting theory the other day and actually had a bit of a debate with some guys at work. The article went on to explain that tran considered a birth defect. I thought hmmm. I guess I mean, the argument such that biologically we are designed to pro create and have very distinguished gender roles. I'm still trying to wrap my head around thi has anyone else heard about this theory or proposition?
Do you have a link to that? It sounds kinda odd.
I think it's as much of a birth defect as being born intersex, as in, it barely qualifies as one.
Trans people are able to procreate, so I don't see what you're getting
at. Sure, trans women can't get pregnant, but trans men can... ***************************************
Logic44, Sysop of LNRC Indiana Boards
board.lnrcbbs.net, ports 22,23,513,64,128
Weather in Indiana: SUCKS
***************************************
---
Logic44 wrote to Darkman Almighty <=-
Your sexuality might change based on where you are in your transition. Some people who were dating men pre-transition might date women post-transition. Shit just happens sometimes, humans are odd.
We're only just now starting to understand how brains work, or at least
we have a much better understanding than before...
We're only just now starting to understand how brains work, or at least
we have a much better understanding than before...
Ummm, have to disagree there. The brain has been well-understood for decades, at least. When is "before"?
| Sysop: | Mojo |
|---|---|
| Location: | Jasckson, Michigan |
| Users: | 8 |
| Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
| Uptime: | 496747:05:21 |
| Calls: | 52 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 9,221 |
| Messages: | 19,198 |
| Posted today: | 1 |