• HYPNOSIS CANNOT HELP 06/2

    From John Short@RICKSBBS to All on Thursday, October 01, 2026 06:14:00
    Hypnosis cannot help with smoking or getting at truth

    06/26/92

    The Toronto Star

    LET'S BE clear about it: there's no such thing as hypnosis! At
    least, not the mystical, occult, trance-like state promoted as
    Mesmerism, or "animal magnetism," by Franz Anton Mesmer
    back in the 18th century.

    Hypnosis, the word itself, was derived form the Greek Hypnos,
    meaning sleep. It's long been known that the hypnotized person is
    not in a sleep or trance state. He or she is really awake and
    participating in the practice of auto-suggestion. And that is what
    it's all about.

    Hypnosis has been given a lot of credit for many things which have
    been attributed to an altered state of consciousness, but which
    were really done through perfectly normal functions of the human
    mind.

    Some examples:

    Many therapists claim to use hypnosis to help cure people of
    habitual behaviors which they otherwise could not shake off.
    Cigarette smoking is a good case in point. Now, in many cases the
    therapist does help. But it is not hypnosis that does the job, it's
    the ability of the therapist to use suggestions that reinforce the
    subject's desire to quit the habit.

    Then there's the subject of controlling pain. There have been
    numerous claims of patients who have undergone dental procedures,
    or even surgery, with no painful experience while under hypnosis.

    Here again, many people, but not all, can control pain - a
    subjective experience - through self-conditioning and relaxation.
    And some such cases of surgery which have been investigated have
    shown that the outer layer of skin has been anesthetized - and
    that is where the majority of pain originates, when the incision
    is made.

    The so-called hypnosis is definitely an aid to the auto-suggested
    exercise.

    One of the fallacies associated with hypnosis is that one can get
    at the truth through a reinforcement of one's memory.

    A recent example was the tragic Kristen French abduction case in
    St. Catharines.

    There were witnesses who claimed to have seen the teenager forced
    into a cream-colored Camaro. In an attempt to elicit more
    information - perhaps a license number - the police had a few of
    these witnesses hypnotized in order to "refresh" their memories.

    It was no surprise to this writer that the effort was fruitless.

    There is no authenticated case on record that accurate memories can
    be recalled by this method. There have been cases where further
    details have been dredged up, but, on investigation, many of these
    have been proven erroneous.

    Memory recall can often be riddled with distortions. Confabulation
    - the tendency for individuals to confuse fact with fiction -
    often surfaces when hypnosis is employed. It can, therefore,
    introduce an element of distortion in a criminal case, an element
    which can have a serious effect on the disposition of justice.
    Dr. Robert A. Baker, psychology professor at University of
    Kentucky, in his book They Call It Hypnosis writes:

    "Our memories are not like computers or phonograph records, but
    more like the village storyteller. Our brain doesn't passively
    store the facts and nothing but the facts; instead it takes the
    facts and weaves them into a plausible and coherent story that,
    surprisingly enough, is recreated with each telling."

    Dr. Baker conducted studies over a period of almost four years on
    the effect of hypnosis on memory. The results: negative.

    The question often arises, why do people brought forward during a
    hypnotist's stage performance seem to fall under the hypnotists
    spell and obey his every command, even to making themselves look
    silly in the process.

    The answer is given by Peter Reveen himself, the foremost stage
    hypnotist of our time. He refers to the "pleasing the operator"
    effect - the "operator" being the hypnotist. "The subject," writes
    Reveen in The Skeptical Inquirer, "feels a strong inner compulsion
    to go through the motions of obeying, even when the only way he
    can do so is by simulating whatever effect he thinks the operator
    expects.'

    The current fascination for the tales of UFO abductions has been
    promoted by the use of regressive hypnosis on the fantasy-prone
    individuals who claim to have been violated. Here again, the
    subject co-operates with the hypnotist who helps impose his strong
    beliefs in the UFO abduction myth. Another example of "pleasing
    the operator."

    It should be stressed that the fantasy-prone are not necessarily
    mentally disturbed. They are normal people who are easily
    suggestible, and who are most easily "hypnotized." And in most
    cases they have read about and been impressed by the many UFO
    abduction stories in circulation.

    One wonders why these "abductions" are not reported to the
    authorities, instead of just being aired in a book and in a movie
    bringing profit to the hypnotist-author. After all, kidnapping is
    a crime, is it not?



    John,
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23